Peer Review

    After I presented my magazine, I got a few critiques about my project. For example, someone suggested I should change my writing in my feature article to horizontal writing instead of columns. However, in every magazine I looked at before I made mine, the writing was in columns, I felt that if I changed mine into horizontal writing, that my feature article would look more like an essay with pictures rather than a magazine article so I decided not to change it. Also, I was told to ad the month and year on my cover page, so I did that. The title of my magazine is "family travel" and I continued the title onto my table of contents as a sort of logo for my magazine. On my table of contents, people said the logo did not show up enough so I copy and pasted it over two more times on top of the logo to darken it so I would stand out more. Finally, someone also said I should have a border added to my feature article so I added that as well and I liked how it turned out.

    I also got a few praises for my magazine, for example, everyone liked my pictures and how they were bright. They also liked how I assorted them on my contents page. I got a comment about someone liking the background I did on my table of contents of the London underground subways. I was especially proud of it because it took a lot of time to make it look just how I wanted it. 

    My opinion on my project is I think it will do very well. I believe I made an amazing magazine through hard work and time. I acknowledged all of the feedback I got and edited my magazine to make some of the suggestions given.